郑大考研网育博书店

1721

主题

0

好友

49

积分

版主

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

UID
186629
性别
保密
帖子
2142
注册时间
2012-2-16

社区QQ达人 版主勋章 有头有脸

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2014-3-14 20:29:46 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
权威推荐:郑州大学2023年考研内部权威资料【点击查看】
总部地址:郑州大学主校区育博书店
考研咨询热线:13633846090(同微信,请优先微信联系)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
同学们在考研语法学习中经常容易混淆同位语从句和定语从句,对两种从句的混淆有时会直接影响到。
  阅读文章的准确理解及翻译句子正确翻译方法的采用,以下对两种从句的区分方法进行专项总结,以便同学们轻松掌握。两种从句的区别主要在以下三方面:
  1. 从词类上区别
  同位语从句前面的名词只能是idea,fact, news, hope, belief, suggestion, proposal, word, thought, doubt, truth, possibility,promise, order等有一定内涵的名词,而定语从句的先行词可以是名词、代词,主句的一部分或是整个主句,如:
  The possibility that the majority of the labor forcewill work at home is often discussed。人们经常讨论大多数劳动力将会在家里工作的可能性。(同位语从句)
  Our team haswon the game, which made us very happy. 我们的队赢了,这让我们很高兴。(定语从句)
  2. 从性质上区别
  定语从句是从句对其先行词的修饰或限制,属于形容词性从句的范畴;而同位语从句是从句对前面抽象名词的进一步的说明和解释,属于名词性从句的范畴,如:
  The news thatour team has won the game was true. 我们队赢了那场比赛的消息是真的。(同位语从句,补充说明news到底是一个什么消息。)
  The news thathe told me yesterday was true. 昨天他告诉我的那个消息是真的。(定语从句,news在从句中作told的宾语。)
  3. 从引导词及其在句子中的成分上区别
  有些引导词如how, whether, what可以引导同位语从句,但不能引导定语从句,如:
  That questionwhether we need it has not been considered. 我们是否需要它这个问题还没有考虑。(同位语从句)
  引导词that引导定语从句时,在从句中一般作主语或宾语(指物时还可以用which代替),并且作宾语时常常省略,that在同位语从句中仅起连接作用,不充当任何成分,并且不能省略,也不能用which来代替,如:
  The orderthat we should send a few people to help the other groups was receivedyesterday. 我们应派几个人去帮别的几个小组的命令昨天收到了。(同位语从句,是对order的具体解释,that虽不作成分,但不能省略。)
  The order thatwe received yesterday was that we should send a few people to help the othergroups. 我们昨天收到的命令是我们应该派几个人去帮助别的几个小组。(定语从句,是名词order的修饰语,that在从句中作received的宾语,可以省略。)
  【真题例句】
  The issue of whether life everexisted on the planet, and whether it persists to this day, has beenhighlighted by mounting evidence that the Red Planet once had abundant stable,liquid water and by the continuing controversy over suggestions that bacterialfossils rode to Earth on a meteorite from Mars。
  【解析】
  句子可拆分为:The issue of//whether life ever existed on the planet, and whether it persists to this day,//has been highlighted //by mounting evidence //that the Red Planet once hadabundant stable, liquid water and //by the continuing controversy oversuggestions //that bacterial fossils rode to Earth on a meteorite from Mars。
  主句为:Theissue of whether life ever existed on the planet, and whether it persists tothis day, has been highlighted by… and by…。主句主语的结构为:The issue of whether…and whether…。of
  短语修饰theissue, of 短语较长一般译在后面;that the RedPlanet…是evidence的同位语从句,(即是evidence的具体内容)。thatbacterial fossils…是suggestions的同位语从句,说明suggestions的具体内容。)第一个同位语从句可以直接翻译在所修饰词后面。第二个同位语可以放在所修饰的名词前面,充当定语。
  【参考译文】
  越来越多的证据表明,这个红色行星上曾经有稳定而丰富的液态水,而且人们对从火星落到地球上的细菌化石陨石的说法一直有争论,使火星上是否存在过生命和是否至今仍有生命的问题成为了引人注目的重点。

分享到: QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
分享淘帖0 分享分享0 收藏收藏0 支持支持0 反对反对0
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

Archiver| ( 豫ICP备07041838号 ) |

郑大考研网育博书店 Powered by 育博书店

回顶部